La banda del espacio Lúdico

Este es parte del equipo de trabajo que estubo haciendo el espacio lúdico. Inspirado en la obra de Phil Kelly muy colorido y lleno de urbe, hubo lágrimas y rizas pero todo bien.

Fragmento "La invasión divina"

"...Enloquecería mucho antes de que muriera(si es que llegaba a morir) y, como les gustaba decir a los ingleses, estaría tan ida como un sombrerero, literalmente, dado que se trataba de un envenenamiento por mercurio. El mercurio, que había sido utilizado para tratar los sombreros de fieltro, había dado a los sombrereros ingleses del siglo XIX la fama de padecer una psicosis orgánica..."

Este es uno de los fragmentos que a paece en el libro de Philip K.Dick La invasión divina, es un libro que te lleva a muchos lugares reconditos de tu alma, apesar de que es ciencia ficción está totalmente de la mano de las creencias perosnales y los cuestionamientos que atañen a la fe religiosa.

Les deceo Feliz feliz no cumpleaños a tí a tú, feliz feliz no cumpleños para mi para tu, que los paces muy felices y ahora soplale a la luuuuuzz

Los enamorados

Después de un magnifico día se ve a una amorosa pareja que encuentra su poética visual en el vagón del metro.

La banda Rolera del concilio

Pesele a quien le pese seguimos en esta anacronica forma de promoción rolera. Agoran te la dedico.

Y las sillas?

en esta imagen nos podemos dar cuenta de la consternación de dos organizadores del área de juegos de rol. Por que nunca vada sale excatamente como se planeo y en esta ocación perdimos sillas. Alguién se las pirateo.

Terrorismo consumista

Esta imagen es impactante por su propia concepción, un poco guerrilla de super. Viva la resistencia!!!1

Mau escuchando musica

Amigos Cosplay

Esta es la imagen de un amigo que tengo que es cosplay, pero más que amigo es una mascota que me encontre se le dicen Miau y es un chavo muy loco. Tal vez por eso es mi mascota. Crecen tan rápìdo T_T

Mis hermanos y yo

La invación divina

Pues aquí con la nueva de que he empezado a leer "La invasión divina" llevo 66 páginas y las emociones siguen su curso y las complicaciones se ponen en un angulo totalmente intencional. No hay trasfondo mutable en ello solo hechos ficticios. La palabra mágica
"Hayah" se supone que sirve para recordarlo todo. Entonces lo que me lleva a recordar que hacer esas lecturas antes de dormir produce alteraciones poco comunes llenas de exraños principios; sacando de mi las extrañas quimeras, eso, o la cena estaba tan cargada que tuve pesadillas. A continuación pondré una pregunta clásica de los creyentes; cuando les suceden cosas fuera de lo común y los lleva a pensar que lo único que hay en el amor de dios es el dolor. ¿Por qué me sucede esto a mí? quien se tome esta pregunta en serio, tal vez lo condusca a una instrospección y descubra los verdaderos propositos del mal y el dolor que mora en su alma. Las cuestiones máximas se ven reducidas a simples figuraciones, ¿En realidad sera una conducta que nos lleve a la iluminación? por o pronto buscare una forma de encontrarme más serca de ello sin que la bomba intelectual explote, antes de que ellos se den cuenta.

Torre latino

Es una imagen dificil de sacar pero con un lente ojo de pescado si se logra.

Realidad o fantasia.

Es increible como la realidad supera a la fantasia. Notan un parecido familiar? Este si es un furry de verdad.

Democracia en cosntrucción

Estas son algunas de las imagenes que tomé en Reforma.

Jose Manuel

Este es José Manuel, se ve simpatico en esta fotografía y tiene una camisa de Spiderman , cada freak que conosco tiene una así él no podía faltar. El aparte de ser Furry es jugador de Warhammer respetable, es otaku y tiene una vida freak que cualquiera envidiaria.

El ingenioso cosplay

No tengo palabras para describir la emoción de ver esto.

Jazek en Bellas Artes

Después de pasar un día en el relajo se atonja tomarse una foto frente al Palacio de Bellas Artes, para lucir fachoso frente a uno de los más bellos y lujosos edificios históricos del país.

Los niños del taller de Puntos cardinales

Estos fueron los niños que estubieron en el taller de verano Puntos cardinales, eran bastantes y parece que se divirtieron, la verdad a mi si me costo mi esfuerzo poder llevar a cabao ese taller, pero me divertí un buen. Es muy padre trabajar con chicos y la verdad son rete latosos.

Los niños tambien rien

La verdad si se refleja en la cara de un niño, siempre hay buena gente que los hace sentir mejor y eso se nota; cuando un pequeño esta feliz vale la pena verlo asi.

El ojo que todo lo mira

 
Este es un simbolo que se encuentra en el centro del recinto parlamentario en palacio nacional. 

Zocalo

 
Asi se ve el zocalo capitalino, quien diria que se trata de una republica. La sangre es roja y el corazon va a la izquierda. En estos dias nada es lo que parece en la repucblica. 

 

Este es...como decirlo, ha! sí, Charly se denomina a sí mismo con este sobrenombre, por cierto se llama Carlos. esta en el taller de curso de verano. Es un chavo bien buena onda y sabe mucho asereca de esto de los talleres para niños. pero tiene un detalle en particular el dic que es sexi, asi que, les mando esta imagen de él para que lo vean. 

Este es Rafa

 
El es uno de los amigos que tengo ahí en el servicio social, se llama rafa; es un exelente guía, si algún día van a palacio nacional y quieren una excelente visita vayan con él se llama Rafel Rios rula para esos asuntos. 

Servicio Social

 
Como todos ustedes saben después de juntar cierta cantidad de créditos en la universidad debes hacer el servicio social. Debido a una costumbre que tenían los médicos para retribiur un poco a la sociedad y lo hacian de manera gratuita; bueno pues, yo hago lo mismo, practico un poco el ambiente laboral en un edificio histótorico llamado nada mas y nada menos que Palacio Nacional 

hahahha South Park fever

n_n

Jajajajaja Hola Camaradas!!!!

Regreso a mis cabales

Después de la larga duda todo retorna a su curso y mi alma se pone de nuevo tranquila.
Sigue mi vida su curso y tantas cosas han sucedido que no se por donde empesar. Lo más duro es el cambio la mudanza de mi primo a Playa del Carmén, demonios no es tan triste tendré donde ir de vacaiones a Cancún!!!! uju!!1
Pasando a cosas menos tristes y más laboriosas, mi servicio social esta muy divertido pero trabajoso si mencionar los altercados y percabses que esto precede.

Las cosas suceden de una forma rara

Cuan curioso puede ser un momento y cambiarlo en un instante. Siguiendo con las relaciones interpersonales pienzo que debe ser extraña la forma en que las cosas se pusieron en marcha. Un día estas en una situación y al siguiente se ponen raras y despues las dejas pasar de largo inclusive sin poner resistencia se pasan simplemente de largo....

R-S-O You scored 22% Non-Reductionism, 33% Epistemological Absolutism, and 66% Moral Objectivism!

You are an R-S-O: a metaphysical Reductionist, an epistemological Skeptic, and a moral Objectivist. What does this all mean? Well, keep reading to find out. Metaphysics: Reductionism (Monism or Positivism) In metaphysics, my test measures your tendency towards Reductionism or Non-Reductionism. As a Reductionist, you like to cut away the metaphysical fat as opposed to multiplying concepts and entities like so many baby rabbits. The two broad categories of Reductionists that my test recognizes are Monists and Positivists. 1. Monists do not cut away the metaphysical fat so much as they just put the meat into a grinder and synthesize the fat into the meat. They tend to condense particular things and ideas into a Unity or Absolute, in other words. If you believe that reality is ultimately a unity and that mind and matter both exist but are simply two different ways of looking at the same substance, then you are a neutral monist in the sense of Spinoza. If you believe that reality is ultimately an Absolute because a whole is more than just the sum of its parts, proven by the fact that we can never have knowledge of a particular thing unless we also grasp its relations to the ultimate Absolute or whole of reality with which it is bound up, and if you feel that this Absolute is characterized by Spirit or Mind, and not matter, then you share the same views as Hegel and even Plato to a degree. A monist--because he or she believes that reality is a Unity or Absolute--tends to synthesize all particulars into universals, deny the reality of matter (Hegel) or mind (Spinoza, sort of), and so on. These concepts are all cast into the meat grinder and come out as a unified whole. Famous monists include philosophers such as Hegel, Spinoza, and Parmenides. If none of the above sounded like you, then you are most definitely the other type of Reductionist. 2. Positivists, unlike monists, do not synthesize two apparently competing views into one--instead, they do away with one of the views, that being the one that cannot be empirically verified. A positivist, then, cuts away the metaphysical fat as meaningless conjecture about nothing in particular. He relies primarily on a tool called Ockham's Razor to shave away these ideas. Ockham's Razor states that we should do away with any hypotheses that needlessly multiply explanatory entities. For instance, in regards to the dispute about the existence of universals, a positivist tends to adopt the position of nominalism--which is the belief that only particulars are real. A universal is only a linguistic construction we use to put particulars into groups--meaning we can reduce all universals to the sum of their parts, that being particulars. After all, we can never have empirical experience of "whiteness", only particular things that are white--nor have we ever observed the universal "mankind", though we can observe individual men. On the mind-body problem, a positivist will be likely to do away with the concept of "mind", reducing it to a material product of our brain functioning. This position is often referred to as the Identity-Theory, because it equates mental states to states of the brain. Clearly, a positivist tends towards a materialistic outlook. Positivism will also revile any idealist conception of reality, which maintains that the world of experience and perception is merely a phenomenal world, whereas the "real" world lies underneath experience and is fundamentally unknowable. A positivist will tend to do away with the idealist hypothesis as needless and unverifiable. Well-known positivists include Carnap, Ayer, and Wittgenstein. ***** Epistemology: Skepticism (Idealism or Subjectivism) In regards to epistemology, my test measures your tendency towards Absolutism or Skepticism. As an epistemological Skeptic, you believe that ultimate reality cannot be known in any objective way. The two categories of Skeptics that my test recognizes are Idealists and Subjectivists. 1. Epistemological Idealists believe that knowledge of ultimate reality is impossible. All we can ever have knowledge about is the world of phenomenal human experience, but there is no reason to suspect that reality mirrors our perceptions and thoughts, according to Idealists. Idealists, then, tend to see truth not as a correspondence between propositions and reality--reality is, after all, fundamentally unknowable--but as a coherence between a whole system of propositions taken to be true. We cannot escape from language or our conceptualized world of phenomena, so we are unable to reference propositions to facts and must instead determine their truth by comparing them to other propositions we hold to be true. As a result of such an idealism, knowledge of any ultimate reality is taken to be impossible, hence the Skeptical tendency of idealism. All our pursuits of knowledge, science included, can only reflect a phenomenal reality that is of our own making. Famous idealists include Kant and Fichte. If the above did not sound skeptical or idealistic enough to reflect your own views, then you are most likely a Subjectivist. 2. Epistemological Subjectivists, like idealists, believe that all our knowledge is ultimately of our own making because it is filtered through our subjective perceptions. Unlike an idealist, though, a subjectivist doesn't believe in any universal categories of "truth" that apply to the phenomenal world, because each individual can create his own truth. Either that, or he will hold that society or custom creates its own forms of truth. A subjectivist will tend to regard scientific inquiry as a game of sorts--science does not reveal truths about reality, but only gives scientists pseudo-solutions to pseudo-problems of the scientific community's own devising. It is a type of puzzle-solving, but the puzzle isn't of reality. The definition of truth to a subjectivist may be one that recognizes a proposition's usefulness to an individual. William James is one such subjectivist, who believes that we can "will to believe" certain propositions so long as we would find them useful. The example he gives is being found in a situation where you must leap over a chasm in order to survive. The true belief, in such a situation, is that the leap will be successful--this truth is certainly more useful to us, and in believing the truth we become more willing to commit to the jump and make it successful. So, in essence, knowledge of reality is possible for a subjectivist because they never make reference to any objective reality existing outside of our own perceptions and beliefs--we can have knowledge of reality through having knowledge of ourselves, and that is all that we should ask for. Famous subjectivists include Kuhn, Feyarabend, and James. Another famed critic of Absolutism is Hume. ***** Ethics: Objectivism (Deontology or Logical Positivism) In Ethics, my test measures your tendency towards moral Objectivism or moral Relativism. As a moral Objectivist, you are opposed to Subjectivist moral theories and believe that morality applies to people universally and actually describes objects and situations out in the world as opposed to just subjects themselves. The two types of moral Objectivists my test recognizes are Kantian Deontologists and Utilitarians. 1. Kantian Deontologists believe that the one intrinsic good is a good will. As rational beings capable of making decisions, the moral worth of our decisions is ultimately derived from the intentions behind our actions, not their consequences. A moral being does the right thing not out of recognition of any consequences, but out of a sense of moral duty. For Kant, a good will is the ultimate good because to deny the will is to deny the one thing that makes us rational, moral beings. If an act will accord with or further our status as free, rational beings, and it is possible to will the universalization of such a moral principle without infringing upon our good wills, then an act is good. Kant's categorical imperative provides an objective standard to judge moral worth--it is not hypothetical in the sense of other imperatives, which hide a latent if-clause. For instance, "Eating razors is good" is good ONLY if you tack on an if-clause that says something like: "If you wish to destroy your gums." Thus, the categorical imperative is good, not just IF something is the case, but in ALL cases. It requires people to treat others as ends, and not means to ends, for to treat everyone as a means to an ends would be to deny them their ability to function as rational, free beings--which is what makes morality possible in the first place. The major propnent of this view in the history of philosophy is, quite obviously, Kant. If that didn't sound like your position, then you are probably the other variety of moral Objectivist--the Utilitarian. 2. Utilitarians define "happiness" or "pleasure" as the sole intrinsic good, and the principle "The greatest pleasure for the greatest number" best reflects a Utilitarian view of ethics. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory, meaning the consequences of an action--not the intentions behind it--determine the act's moral worth. Even if you intended to do great evil with a certain act, if the act produces a net gain of pleasure and happiness for the greatest number, then it was indeed a good act because your intentions weren't realized. What matters in this scenario, obviously, is the consequences of the act. Utilitarianism, of course, can also be reduced to Hedonism. If you do not feel that the greatest happiness of the greatest number matters, but only pay heed to the greatest happiness of individuals, then you are more adequately classified as a Hedonist. But both Utilitarians and Hedonists define "pleasure" as an intrinsic good and determine the moral worth of an act through its consequences. The only difference is whether we measure the collective pleasure of a group or only an individual's pleasure. Prominent Utilitarians include Bentham and Mill. ***** As you can see, when your philosophical position is narrowed down there are so many potential categories that an OKCupid test cannot account for them all. But, taken as very broad categories or philosophical styles, you are best characterized as an R-S-O. Your exact philosophical opposite would be an N-A-R.

My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 2% on Metaphysics You scored higher than 17% on Epistemology You scored higher than 82% on Ethics

Link: The Sublime Philosophical Crap Test written by saint_gasoline on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

o.o

Hippie You are 14% Rational, 85% Extroverted, 28% Brutal, and 42% Arrogant.

You are the Hippie! Characterized by a strong sense of extroversion, irrationality, gentleness, humility, and a faint scent of marijuana, you no doubt frolic through fields preaching peace and free love! Immediately following that, you then frolic to the hospital with herpes! You are probably either very spiritual or needlessly paranoid about "the man", like most hippies, as a result of your focus on intuition and feelings over cold, brutal logic. You probably enjoy poetry, especially beatnik ultra-liberal crap about how horrible fascism is, even though your suburbanized, sheltered idea of "fascism" is having to pay two dollars per gallon at the gas pump. You are also very, very social. And like any hippie who would have no qualms about hitchiking across the country just to meet some interesting people, you also love to interact with others, even complete strangers. Though I highly doubt they love to interact with you! Because we know most any hippie is peace-loving and humble, it stands to reason that you, as well, are terribly gentle and humble, almost to the point of revulsion. Your carefree attitude of peace and harmony is probably very, very sickening to realists or cynics or anyone who isn't a hippie, to tell the truth. In short, your personality is defective because you are overly emotional, extroverted, gentle, and humble--thus making you an annoying hippie. Now go do your drugs and have sex with filthy bearded men in tye dye shirts. To put it less negatively: 1. You are more INTUITIVE than rational. 2. You are more EXTROVERTED than introverted. 3. You are more GENTLE than brutal. 4. You are more HUMBLE than arrogant. Compatibility: Your exact opposite is the Sociopath. Other personalities you would probably get along with are the Hand-Raiser, the Televangelist, and the Robot. * * If you scored near fifty percent for a certain trait (42%-58%), you could very well go either way. For example, someone with 42% Extroversion is slightly leaning towards being an introvert, but is close enough to being an extrovert to be classified that way as well. Below is a list of the other personality types so that you can determine which other possible categories you may fill if you scored near fifty percent for certain traits. The other personality types: The Emo Kid: Intuitive, Introverted, Gentle, Humble. The Starving Artist: Intuitive, Introverted, Gentle, Arrogant. The Bitch-Slap: Intuitive, Introverted, Brutal, Humble. The Brute: Intuitive, Introverted, Brutal, Arrogant. The Hippie: Intuitive, Extroverted, Gentle, Humble. The Televangelist: Intuitive, Extroverted, Gentle, Arrogant. The Schoolyard Bully: Intuitive, Extroverted, Brutal, Humble. The Class Clown: Intuitive, Extroverted, Brutal, Arrogant. The Robot: Rational, Introverted, Gentle, Humble. The Haughty Intellectual: Rational, Introverted, Gentle, Arrogant. The Spiteful Loner: Rational, Introverted, Brutal, Humble. The Sociopath: Rational, Introverted, Brutal, Arrogant. The Hand-Raiser: Rational, Extroverted, Gentle, Humble. The Braggart: Rational, Extroverted, Gentle, Arrogant. The Capitalist Pig: Rational, Extroverted, Brutal, Humble. The Smartass: Rational, Extroverted, Brutal, Arrogant. Be sure to take my Sublime Philosophical Crap Test if you are interested in taking a slightly more intellectual test that has just as many insane ramblings as this one does!

My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 8% on Rationality You scored higher than 84% on Extroversion You scored higher than 25% on Brutality You scored higher than 39% on Arrogance

Link: The Personality Defect Test written by saint_gasoline on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

Fin de Semestre

Pues aqui con la novedad de que pude pasar el fin de semestre.
Estubo tortuoso pero ya fué el último gracias al señor. Por lo menos de aqui hasta que llege al posgrado. jajajaja fué bueno mientras duro.

VIaje a la ciudad de Oaxaca en dos palabras...o.o

Cantera verde

Feliz cumpleaños mi furry del alma

Feliz cumpleaños el día de hoy a mi amor, te quiero muchisimo José Manuel. Te mando abrazos y besos. Que te la pases muy cool cariño.

las funciones del ego y la matematica universal

Todo gira alrededor de tres ideas, el miedo, vacio y silencio.
Todo a mi alrededor es así una gran marea de formas que se destrozan inminentemente.
Esto no es necesariamente sierto a todos los niveles. Solo en el penzamiento; mi penzamiento esta formado de miles de capas inciertas moviles deciertas en algunos puntos.
Tan tagencial como debil esta creencia de que se esta en lo cierto. Silencio desbocado consecutivo.
Tremenda visita enclaustrada. Pensamientos inquietos y la manía de querer tener algo estable. Y la incesante pregunta ¿creo lo que vivo?

Expo de Escultura para el 25 de Mayo

Les invito a mi expocición de escultura proxima a realizarse es una muestra colectiva que se hara con el objeto de demostrar como se encuentran los alumnos empezando un taller de escultura con el escultor Sebastian. Los espero. Será en la fundación sebastian por ahí de las 7pm no falten. Direccion de la fundacion AV. Patriotismo numero 304, Col. San Pedro de los pinos entre calle 5 y 7.

Las cosas otra vez se ponen locas

Todos los dias cosas por hacer..momentos de vacio llenos de algo que no comprendo. Solo se que debo seguir y la pregunta entonces es: ¿Vivo lo que creo? La respuesta sigue en incognita la matematica universal me llama. El silencio esta lejos por ahora.

Lejos una vez mas

Ultimamente me estaba quejando de la inactividad, pues mis suplicas fueron escuchadas y pues...ahora casi no tengo tiempo para nada, estoy muy ocupada y me da gusto estar así.